Done viewing results, go back to VoteFair's American Idol page

 

  

VoteFair Ranking Results calculated at  www.VoteFair.org 2011-April-21  16:20

Poll title:

     American Idol, Season 10, Top 7    

Question (number 1) title:

     Who is your favorite, second-favorite, etc., singer?    

The most preferred and most representative choice is:

    James Durbin

Overall popularity ranking:

     
Popularity Choice VoteFair
ranking
score
Traditional
vote count

(for comparison)
First-most popular James Durbin  Ranking score is 64 for James Durbin 389 voters marked James Durbin as their first choice
Second-most popular Scotty McCreery  Ranking score is 50 for Scotty McCreery 329 voters marked Scotty McCreery as their first choice
Third-most popular Lauren Alaina  Ranking score is 43 for Lauren Alaina 151 voters marked Lauren Alaina as their first choice
Fourth-most popular Haley Reinhart  Ranking score is 32 for Haley Reinhart 214 voters marked Haley Reinhart as their first choice
Fifth-most popular Casey Abrams  Ranking score is 24 for Casey Abrams 197 voters marked Casey Abrams as their first choice
Sixth-most popular Stefano Langone  Ranking score is 10 for Stefano Langone 48 voters marked Stefano Langone as their first choice
Seventh-most popular Jacob Lusk  Ranking score is 0 for Jacob Lusk 37 voters marked Jacob Lusk as their first choice

VoteFair representation Ranking

  

First-most representative choice is:

James Durbin

Second-most representative choice is:

Scotty McCreery

Third-most representative choice is:

Lauren Alaina

Additional levels of representation were not calculated.
(There may be too many questions, too many choices for this question, or too many votes, or no further calculations were requested.)

VoteFair representation ranking results should be used when more than one choice is to be selected. Why? When there are 100 voters, 51 of them can choose the first winner, so the other 49 voters deserve extra influence in choosing the second winner (instead of letting the 51 voters also choose the second winner). When should representation results be used? When a second candidate is elected to a second equivalent seat in a state legislature, or when an organization pursues a simultaneous second activity in addition to the most popular activity.

Comparison of VoteFair Ranking with other voting methods

  
Voting method Winner
VoteFair James Durbin
Instant runoff James Durbin
(25 ballots at least partially ignored because they include an equal preference at a significant step in the runoff process.
(Choice eliminated in the first round : Jacob Lusk)
Majority None of the choices has won a majority (more than half) the votes.

(24 ballots ignored because they rank more than one choice as the most-preferred choice.)
Plurality James Durbin

(24 ballots ignored because they rank more than one choice as the most-preferred choice.)
Condorcet James Durbin
Borda count James Durbin
(135 ballots ignored because they rank more than one choice at the same preference level.)

Details of plurality results

  
Choice Vote count Percentage
James Durbin 389 28 389 voters marked James Durbin as their first choice
Scotty McCreery 329 24 329 voters marked Scotty McCreery as their first choice
Haley Reinhart 214 16 214 voters marked Haley Reinhart as their first choice
Casey Abrams 197 14 197 voters marked Casey Abrams as their first choice
Lauren Alaina 151 11 151 voters marked Lauren Alaina as their first choice
Stefano Langone 48 4 48 voters marked Stefano Langone as their first choice
Jacob Lusk 37 3 37 voters marked Jacob Lusk as their first choice
(24 ballots ignored in plurality counting because they rank more than one choice as the most-preferred choice.)

Notice that the choice with the most plurality votes is not necessarily the most popular. Similarly the choice with the fewest plurality votes is not necessarily the least popular.

Data and Calculation Summary
Number of votes: 1,389
The following tally table summarizes all the preferences of all the voters. The bold underlined numbers are the ones that apply to the winning sequence.
  
All possible pairs of choice names Number of votes with indicated preference
Prefer X over Y Equal preference Prefer Y over X
X = James Durbin
Y = Scotty McCreery
765
765 voters prefer James Durbin over Scotty McCreery
35
35 voters have an equal preference for James Durbin and Scotty McCreery
589
589 voters prefer Scotty McCreery over James Durbin
X = James Durbin
Y = Lauren Alaina
810
810 voters prefer James Durbin over Lauren Alaina
34
34 voters have an equal preference for James Durbin and Lauren Alaina
545
545 voters prefer Lauren Alaina over James Durbin
X = James Durbin
Y = Haley Reinhart
837
837 voters prefer James Durbin over Haley Reinhart
48
48 voters have an equal preference for James Durbin over Haley Reinhart
504
504 voters prefer Haley Reinhart over James Durbin
X = James Durbin
Y = Casey Abrams
822
822 voters prefer James Durbin over Casey Abrams
52
52 voters have an equal preference for James Durbin over Casey Abrams
515
515 voters prefer Casey Abrams over James Durbin
X = James Durbin
Y = Stefano Langone
1,044
1,044 voter prefer James Durbin over Stefano Langone
50
50 voters have an equal preference for James Durbin and Stefano Langone
295
295 voters prefer Stefano Langone over James Durbin
X = James Durbin
Y = Jacob Lusk
1,096
1,096 voter prefer James Durbin over Jacob Lusk
50
50 voters have an equal preference for James Durbin over Jacob Lusk
243
243 voters prefer Jacob Lusk over James Durbin
X = Scotty McCreery
Y = Lauren Alaina
697
697 voters prefer Scotty McCreery over Lauren Alaina
45
45 voters have an equal preference for Scotty McCreery over Lauren Alaina
647
647 voters prefer Lauren Alaina over Scotty McCreery
X = Scotty McCreery
Y = Haley Reinhart
705
705 voters prefer Scotty McCreery over Haley Reinhart
37
37 voters have an equal preference for Scotty McCreery over Haley Reinhart
647
647 voters prefer Haley Reinhart over Scotty McCreery
X = Scotty McCreery
Y = Casey Abrams
726
726 voters prefer Scotty McCreery over Casey Abrams
37
37 voters have an equal preference for Scotty McCreery over Casey Abrams
626
626 voters prefer Casey Abrams over Scotty McCreery
X = Scotty McCreery
Y = Stefano Langone
1,004
1,004 voter prefer Scotty McCreery over Stefano Langone
51
51 voters have an equal preference for Scotty McCreery and Stefano Langone
334
334 voters prefer Stefano Langone over Scotty McCreery
X = Scotty McCreery
Y = Jacob Lusk
1,076
1,076 voter prefer Scotty McCreery over Jacob Lusk
46
46 voters have an equal preference for Scotty McCreery over Jacob Lusk
267
267 voters prefer Jacob Lusk over Scotty McCreery
X = Lauren Alaina
Y = Haley Reinhart
715
715 voters prefer Lauren Alaina over Haley Reinhart
41
41 voters have an equal preference for Lauren Alaina over Haley Reinhart
633
633 voters prefer Haley Reinhart over Lauren Alaina
X = Lauren Alaina
Y = Casey Abrams
697
697 voters prefer Lauren Alaina over Casey Abrams
45
45 voters have an equal preference for Lauren Alaina over Casey Abrams
647
647 voters prefer Casey Abrams over Lauren Alaina
X = Lauren Alaina
Y = Stefano Langone
1,034
1,034 voter prefer Lauren Alaina over Stefano Langone
54
54 voters have an equal preference for Lauren Alaina and Stefano Langone
301
301 voters prefer Stefano Langone over Lauren Alaina
X = Lauren Alaina
Y = Jacob Lusk
1,099
1,099 voter prefer Lauren Alaina over Jacob Lusk
46
46 voters have an equal preference for Lauren Alaina over Jacob Lusk
244
244 voters prefer Jacob Lusk over Lauren Alaina
X = Haley Reinhart
Y = Casey Abrams
687
687 voters prefer Haley Reinhart over Casey Abrams
58
58 voters have an equal preference for Haley Reinhart over Casey Abrams
644
644 voters prefer Casey Abrams over Haley Reinhart
X = Haley Reinhart
Y = Stefano Langone
986
986 voters prefer Haley Reinhart over Stefano Langone
65
65 voters have an equal preference for Haley Reinhart and Stefano Langone
338
338 voters prefer Stefano Langone over Haley Reinhart
X = Haley Reinhart
Y = Jacob Lusk
1,025
1,025 voter prefer Haley Reinhart over Jacob Lusk
60
60 voters have an equal preference for Haley Reinhart and Jacob Lusk
304
304 voters prefer Jacob Lusk over Haley Reinhart
X = Casey Abrams
Y = Stefano Langone
948
948 voters prefer Casey Abrams over Stefano Langone
61
61 voters have an equal preference for Casey Abrams and Stefano Langone
380
380 voters prefer Stefano Langone over Casey Abrams
X = Casey Abrams
Y = Jacob Lusk
1,055
1,055 voter prefer Casey Abrams over Jacob Lusk
59
59 voters have an equal preference for Casey Abrams and Jacob Lusk
275
275 voters prefer Jacob Lusk over Casey Abrams
X = Stefano Langone
Y = Jacob Lusk
798
798 voters prefer Stefano Langone over Jacob Lusk
76
76 voters have an equal preference for Stefano Langone over Jacob Lusk
515
515 voters prefer Jacob Lusk over Stefano Langone
The highest score (which equals the sum of the bold underlined numbers, plus either tally number in any tied pair of choices) is: 18,626
Number of all possible valid sequences (without ties): 5,040
First sequence:
  1. Casey Abrams
  2. Haley Reinhart
  3. Jacob Lusk
  4. James Durbin
  5. Lauren Alaina
  6. Scotty McCreery
  7. Stefano Langone
Last sequence:
  1. Stefano Langone
  2. Scotty McCreery
  3. Lauren Alaina
  4. James Durbin
  5. Jacob Lusk
  6. Haley Reinhart
  7. Casey Abrams
© Copyright 2009 Solutions Through Innovation at www.VoteFair.org

Detailed ballot information
(The numbers indicate the choices
as listed in "First sequence" above,
a comma indicates the next lower preference level,
"&" joins choices at the same preference level,
and "x" precedes the vote count.)

  • 1&2&3&4&5&6&7 x6
  • 1&2&4,3&5&6&7 x2
  • 1&2,3&4&6,5&7 x1
  • 1&4&6,3,2&5,7 x1
  • 1&4,2&3&5&6&7 x1
  • 1&4,2&3&6,5&7 x1
  • 1&5&6&7,2,4,3 x1
  • 1&6,4,2,5,3,7 x1
  • 1,2&3&4&5&6&7 x1
  • 1,2,3&4&5&6&7 x1
  • 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 x1
  • 1,2,3,4,6,7,5 x4
  • 1,2,3,4,7,5,6 x1
  • 1,2,3,4,7,6,5 x1
  • 1,2,3,6,5,7,4 x1
  • 1,2,3,7,4,6,5 x1
  • 1,2,3,7,6,5,4 x1
  • 1,2,4,3,5,6,7 x1
  • 1,2,4,3,6,5,7 x1
  • 1,2,4,3,6,7,5 x1
  • 1,2,4,5,3,7,6 x3
  • 1,2,4,5,6,7,3 x3
  • 1,2,4,5,7,3,6 x1
  • 1,2,4,6,5,3,7 x2
  • 1,2,4,6,5,7,3 x2
  • 1,2,4,6,7,5,3 x2
  • 1,2,4,7,3,6,5 x1
  • 1,2,4,7,5,6,3 x3
  • 1,2,4,7,6,3,5 x3
  • 1,2,4,7,6,5,3 x1
  • 1,2,5,3,7,4,6 x1
  • 1,2,5,4,3,6,7 x1
  • 1,2,5,4,6&7,3 x1
  • 1,2,5,4,6,7,3 x2
  • 1,2,5,6,7,4,3 x1
  • 1,2,5,7,4,6,3 x1
  • 1,2,5,7,6,4,3 x1
  • 1,2,6,3&5,4,7 x1
  • 1,2,6,3,7,5,4 x1
  • 1,2,6,4,3,7,5 x3
  • 1,2,6,4,5,7,3 x2
  • 1,2,6,5,4,7,3 x2
  • 1,2,7,3,4,5,6 x1
  • 1,2,7,3,4,6,5 x1
  • 1,2,7,4,5,3,6 x1
  • 1,2,7,4,5,6,3 x1
  • 1,2,7,4,6,3,5 x1
  • 1,2,7,4,6,5,3 x1
  • 1,2,7,6,5,4,3 x2
  • 1,3,2,5,7,4,6 x1
  • [Remaining ballots not listed]

© Copyright 2009 Solutions Through Innovation at www.VoteFair.org

Software version: 2011-Apr-21

The free VoteFair ranking service is subsidized by sales of Ending The Hidden Unfairness In U.S. Elections and The Creative Problem Solver's Toolbox, which were written by Richard Fobes, the inventor of VoteFair ranking and the programmer and writer for the VoteFair site.

Cover of Ending The Hidden Unfairness In U.S. Elections Cover of The Creative Problem Solver's Toolbox

 

Done viewing results, go back to VoteFair's American Idol page

 


 

Return to http://www.VoteFair.org/index.html

         

Top of Page

© Copyright 2011 Solutions Through Innovation at www.VoteFair.org (Email address, non-machine-readable to reduce spam)